Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Rice v. Ray & McArthur

Rice v. Ray & McArthur

93 S.E. 43, 20 Ga. App. 391, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 902
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 27, 1917
Docket8384
StatusPublished

This text of 93 S.E. 43 (Rice v. Ray & McArthur) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rice v. Ray & McArthur, 93 S.E. 43, 20 Ga. App. 391, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 902 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Wade, 0. J.

It does not appear that the court committed any error in overruling the certiorari in this case. The magistrate’s original and amended answer apparently included everything relating to the ease which was embraced by his knowledge thereof; and we can not say that the court erred in failing to allow the petitioner to except further to the answers, and in finally overruling the certiorari, since the allegations made in the petition and not verified by the answer of the magistrate could not be considered. Gilmore v. Georgian Co., 17 Ga. App. 759 (88 S. E. 416), and cases cited.

Judgment affirmed.

George and Luhe, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gilmore v. Georgian Co.
88 S.E. 416 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 S.E. 43, 20 Ga. App. 391, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rice-v-ray-mcarthur-gactapp-1917.