Gillman v. Davidson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Gillman v. Davidson

934 S.W.2d 803, 1996 Tex. App. LEXIS 4858, 1996 WL 614624

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 18, 1996·No. 01-96-01106-CV·Published·Cited by 23 cases

Opinions

EN BANC OPINION

PER CURIAM.

On September 30, 1996, the Court granted relator’s motion for rehearing en bane of its motion for leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus, and granted leave to file. After consideration of the case en banc, a majority [804] of the Court has come to the conclusion that leave to file was improvidently granted.

We OVERRULE relator’s petition. We rescind our order of September 19, 1996, staying Judge Davidson’s order compelling arbitration.

It is so ORDERED.

HEDGES, J., dissents. HUTSON-DUNN, O’CONNOR and ANDELL, JJ., join the dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

EN BANC OPINION

PER CURIAM.

On September 30, 1996, the Court granted relator’s motion for rehearing en bane of its motion for leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus, and granted leave to file. After consideration of the case en banc, a majority [804] of the Court has come to the conclusion that leave to file was improvidently granted.

We OVERRULE relator’s petition. We rescind our order of September 19, 1996, staying Judge Davidson’s order compelling arbitration.

It is so ORDERED.

HEDGES, J., dissents. HUTSON-DUNN, O’CONNOR and ANDELL, JJ., join the dissent.

Gillman v. Davidson, 934 S.W.2d 803, 1996 Tex. App. LEXIS 4858, 1996 WL 614624 (Tex. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

934 S.W.2d 803 (Gillman v. Davidson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related