Gillman v. Davidson
This text of 934 S.W.2d 803 (Gillman v. Davidson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
EN BANC OPINION
On September 30, 1996, the Court granted relator’s motion for rehearing en bane of its motion for leave to file a petition for writ of mandamus, and granted leave to file. After consideration of the case en banc, a majority [804]*804of the Court has come to the conclusion that leave to file was improvidently granted.
We OVERRULE relator’s petition. We rescind our order of September 19, 1996, staying Judge Davidson’s order compelling arbitration.
It is so ORDERED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
934 S.W.2d 803, 1996 Tex. App. LEXIS 4858, 1996 WL 614624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gillman-v-davidson-texapp-1996.