Giles v. State

149 S.E.2d 432, 113 Ga. App. 629, 1966 Ga. App. LEXIS 1158
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 10, 1966·No. 42009·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Hall, Judge.

The defendant appeals from his conviction for robbery.

In the absence of a proper request, it is not error for the trial court to omit from the charge to the jury instructions as to the rules by which to test the credibility of witnesses and the law on impeachment of witnesses. Stevens v. Central R. & Bkg. Co., 80 Ga. 19, 24 (5 SE 253); Freeman v. Coleman, Ray & Co., 88 Ga. 421 (14 SE 551); Benton v. State, 185 Ga. 254, 257 (194 SE 166); Douberly v. State, 184 Ga. 577 (192 SE 226); Smith v. State, 7 Ga. App. 710 (67 SE 1048).

The evidence was sufficient to support the conviction.

Judgment affirmed.

Nichols, P. J., and Deen, J., concur. Edward J. Goodwin, for appellant. Andrew J. Ryan, Jr., Solicitor General, Robert B. Barker, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Giles v. State, 149 S.E.2d 432, 113 Ga. App. 629, 1966 Ga. App. LEXIS 1158 (Ga. Ct. App. 1966).

149 S.E.2d 432 (Giles v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bernard Weeks v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012
Weeks v. State
729 S.E.2d 570 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012)
DAMEROW v. State
714 S.E.2d 82 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2011)
Neloms v. Carmichael
187 S.E.2d 555 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)