Georgia v. United States Army Corps of Engineers

144 F. App'x 850
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedSeptember 19, 2005
DocketNo. 04-14864; D.C. Docket No. 01-00026-CV-RWS-2
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 144 F. App'x 850 (Georgia v. United States Army Corps of Engineers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Georgia v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, 144 F. App'x 850 (11th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State of Georgia, Gwinnett County, the Atlanta Regional Commission, and the City of Gainesville appeal an order of abatement. The district court abated and administratively closed this case, pending final judgment in Alabama v. U.S. Corps of Engineers, No. CV-90-H-01331-E, a substantially similar case proceeding before the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama.

We review the district court’s decision to abate on abstention grounds for abuse of discretion. See Ambrosia Coal and Constr. Co. v. Morales, 368 F.3d 1320, 1332 (11th Cir.2004). Seeing none, we AFFIRM the abatement.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng'rs
304 F. Supp. 3d 56 (D.C. Circuit, 2018)
In Re MDL-1824 Tri-State Water Rights Litigation
644 F.3d 1160 (Eleventh Circuit, 2011)
Alabama v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
644 F.3d 1160 (Eleventh Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
144 F. App'x 850, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/georgia-v-united-states-army-corps-of-engineers-ca11-2005.