Georgia v. United States Army Corps of Engineers

Eleventh Circuit

Georgia v. United States Army Corps of Engineers

144 F. App'x 850

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided September 19, 2005·No. No. 04-14864; D.C. Docket No. 01-00026-CV-RWS-2·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State of Georgia, Gwinnett County, the Atlanta Regional Commission, and the City of Gainesville appeal an order of abatement. The district court abated and administratively closed this case, pending final judgment in Alabama v. U.S. Corps of Engineers, No. CV-90-H-01331-E, a substantially similar case proceeding before the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama.

We review the district court’s decision to abate on abstention grounds for abuse of discretion. See Ambrosia Coal and Constr. Co. v. Morales, 368 F.3d 1320, 1332 (11th Cir.2004). Seeing none, we AFFIRM the abatement.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The State of Georgia, Gwinnett County, the Atlanta Regional Commission, and the City of Gainesville appeal an order of abatement. The district court abated and administratively closed this case, pending final judgment in Alabama v. U.S. Corps of Engineers, No. CV-90-H-01331-E, a substantially similar case proceeding before the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama.

We review the district court’s decision to abate on abstention grounds for abuse of discretion. See Ambrosia Coal and Constr. Co. v. Morales, 368 F.3d 1320, 1332 (11th Cir.2004). Seeing none, we AFFIRM the abatement.

AFFIRMED.

Georgia v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, 144 F. App'x 850 (11th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

144 F. App'x 850 (Georgia v. United States Army Corps of Engineers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related