Georgia Railroad v. Lawrence

74 Ga. 534, 1885 Ga. LEXIS 352
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 10, 1885
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 74 Ga. 534 (Georgia Railroad v. Lawrence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Georgia Railroad v. Lawrence, 74 Ga. 534, 1885 Ga. LEXIS 352 (Ga. 1885).

Opinion

Blandeord, Justice.

Defendant in error brought his action against the plaintiff in error, and by his declaration claimed that he had sustained damages by reason of the careless running of the engines of plaintiff in error, whereby his fences were destroyed by fire and his crops injured and destroyed. Evidence was admitted without objection, which tended to. show that the grass on the right-of-way of the railroad was set on fire from sparks of the engines of defendant’s company, and that from this the fences of the plaintiff below were set on fire and destroyed. This is the only evidence [535]*535of neglect on the part of the railroad company. Under the pleadings in the case, it may be that the testimony as to the burning of the grass on the-'railroad company’s right-of way was inadmissible; yet it was admitted without objection; it was before the jury for their consideration, and, as decided by this court in the case of Ocean Steamship Company vs. Williams, 69 Ga., 251, where evidence is admitted without objection, although there is no allegation in the declaration authorizing the same, it is proper for the court to charge the jury as to its legal effect. So we think that this testimony tended to show negligence on the part of plaintiff in error.

We are unanimously of opinion, and so rule, that where pi operty of a person has been destroyed by fire on account of the running of the engines of a railroad company, without fault or negligence of such railroad company or its agents in any way, in such a case, the railroad company would not be liable.

There was no error in refusing the new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harvey v. DeWeill
116 S.E.2d 747 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1960)
Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. Hickman
111 S.E.2d 380 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1959)
Steed v. Rees
14 S.E.2d 474 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Pollard v. Walton
190 S.E. 396 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)
National Life & Accident Insurance v. Lain
179 S.E. 751 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Reese
158 S.E. 774 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Clackum v. Bagwell
151 S.E. 689 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Folds v. City Council of Augusta
151 S.E. 685 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Satterfield v. Medlin
130 S.E. 822 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1925)
Georgia Railway & Power Co. v. Belote
93 S.E. 62 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Gainesville & Northwestern Railroad v. Galloway
87 S.E. 1093 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Southern Railway Co. v. Black
80 S.E. 323 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. McRee
76 S.E. 152 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Davis & Brandon
62 S.E. 1022 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)
Gainesville, Jefferson & Southern Railroad v. Edmondson
29 S.E. 213 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1897)
Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. Attaway
16 S.E. 956 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 Ga. 534, 1885 Ga. LEXIS 352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/georgia-railroad-v-lawrence-ga-1885.