General Motors Corp. v. Erves

395 Mich. 923, 1976 Mich. LEXIS 355
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 27, 1976
DocketDocket Nos. 55138-55141
StatusPublished

This text of 395 Mich. 923 (General Motors Corp. v. Erves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
General Motors Corp. v. Erves, 395 Mich. 923, 1976 Mich. LEXIS 355 (Mich. 1976).

Opinion

On the Court’s own motion it is ordered that these appeals be and the [924]*924same are hereby resubmitted for decision, without further argument or briefing by the parties.

J. R. Wheatley, for plaintiff-appellant. John A. Fillion, Jordan Rossen, Edwin G. Fabré, Ralph O. Jones, Leonard Page, Anne Trebilcock, Marley Weiss, and M. Jay Whitman, for defendants-appellees Bloomer, Kartsonas, and Erves. Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, and Felix E. League, Assistant Attorney General, for defendant-appellee Michigan Employment Security Commission.

Reported at 395 Mich 604.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

General Motors Corp. v. Erves
236 N.W.2d 432 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
395 Mich. 923, 1976 Mich. LEXIS 355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/general-motors-corp-v-erves-mich-1976.