General Electric Co. v. Kirkpatrick

312 F.2d 742
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided December 31, 1962·No. No. 14218·Published·Cited by 21 cases

Opinion

BIGGS, Chief Judge,

notes his dissent from the order, insofar as it denies a rule to show cause why the writs of prohibition and mandamus should not issue.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

General Electric Co. v. Kirkpatrick, 312 F.2d 742 (3d Cir. 1962).

312 F.2d 742 (General Electric Co. v. Kirkpatrick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Newport Pacific Inc. v. County of San Diego
200 F.R.D. 628 (S.D. California, 2001)
National Tank Co. v. Brotherton
851 S.W.2d 193 (Texas Supreme Court, 1993)
Haggerty v. Yamaha Motor Corp.
3 Pa. D. & C.4th 499 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1989)
Consolidation Coal Co. v. Bucyrus-Erie Co.
432 N.E.2d 250 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1982)
Upjohn Co. v. United States
449 U.S. 383 (Supreme Court, 1981)
Byrnes v. IDS Realty Trust
85 F.R.D. 679 (S.D. New York, 1980)
Barr Marine Products Co. v. Borg-Warner Corp.
84 F.R.D. 631 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1979)
General Counsel v. United States
599 F.2d 504 (Second Circuit, 1979)
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena
599 F.2d 504 (Second Circuit, 1979)
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Canadian Javelin Ltd.
451 F. Supp. 594 (District of Columbia, 1978)
Attorney General of the United States v. Covington & Burling
430 F. Supp. 1117 (District of Columbia, 1977)