Gene B. Glick Company, Inc. v. Sunshine Ready Concrete Company, Inc.
This text of 651 So. 2d 190 (Gene B. Glick Company, Inc. v. Sunshine Ready Concrete Company, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
GENE B. GLICK COMPANY, INC., CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY and BACK BAY APARTMENTS, Appellants,
v.
SUNSHINE READY CONCRETE COMPANY, INC., Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Larry A. Karns, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.
Thomas D. Daiello of Marchbanks, Daiello & Leider, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court in all respects except we reverse as to that portion of the final judgment in favor of the appellee, Sunshine Ready Concrete Co., against the appellant, Back Bay Apartments for unjust enrichment.
Unjust enrichment is equitable in nature and cannot exist where payment has been made for the benefit conferred. Back Bay paid Glick Company the full amount of its contract for the construction project. Accordingly, there can be no unjust enrichment to support Sunshine's claim.
GUNTHER, PARIENTE and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
651 So. 2d 190, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1743, 1995 WL 71291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gene-b-glick-company-inc-v-sunshine-ready-concrete-company-inc-fladistctapp-1995.