Gendron v. Parc at Murfreesboro
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
DEREK and LYNN GENDRON, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) No. 3:24-cv-00674 ) PARC AT MURFREESBORO POE ) LLC, PEGASUS RESIDENTIAL LLC, ) COLUMBBIA DEBT RECOVERY LLC, ) and AMERICAN LANDMARK ) MANAGEMENT, LLC ) ) Defendants. ) ) ORDER Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. No. 39) recommending that the Court grant Defendant Pegasus Residential, LLC’s (“Pegasus Residential”) motion to dismiss, and dismiss Pegasus Residential from this lawsuit. Plaintiffs Derek Gendron and Lynn Gendron have not filed timely objections to the R&R despite the R&R’s specific warnings regarding waiver. (Id. at 13-14). When neither party objects to the R&R within 14 days of service, the Court need not review the matter independently. Lawhorn v. Buy Buy Baby, Inc., No. 3:20-cv-00201, 2021 WL 1063075, at *1 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 19, 2021); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985) (“It does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate’s factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings.”). Despite this, the Court reviewed the R&R and agrees with its recommended disposition. Accordingly, the R&R (Doc. No. 39) is APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Pegasus Residential is dismissed from this action. IT IS SO ORDERED.
WAVERLY AS. Cine JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gendron v. Parc at Murfreesboro (Gendron v. Parc at Murfreesboro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.