Gay v. Gay
This text of 32 S.E. 846 (Gay v. Gay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. It appearing that the question made in the cross-bill of exceptions is controlling upon the case as a whole, it has been first considered ; and inasmuch as the judgment therein is reversed, there is no occasion for determining the errors alleged in the main bill of exceptions. Cheshire v. Williams, 101 Ga. 814; Jordan v. Ga. So. Ry. Co., 105 Ga. 274; Hollis v. Lawton, 107 Ga. 105.
2. Upon the line of construction indicated by this court in White v. Hopkins, 80 Ga. 154, which has since been followed in Goff v. Davenport, 96 Ga. 423, and Guthrie v. Guthrie, 105 Ga. 86, the instrument under consideration in the present case was a deed and not a will. See Barnes v. Stephens, 107 Ga. 442.
Judgment reversed, on eross-bill of exceptions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 S.E. 846, 108 Ga. 739, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gay-v-gay-ga-1899.