Jackson v. Warthen

36 S.E. 214, 111 Ga. 834, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 786
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 12, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 36 S.E. 214 (Jackson v. Warthen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson v. Warthen, 36 S.E. 214, 111 Ga. 834, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 786 (Ga. 1900).

Opinion

Cobb, J.

1. It is not a good ground of objection to an application by an administrator for leave to sell lands or stocks in an incorporated company, for the purpose of paying debts, that the market is depressed and that for this reason the property will not sell for its full value.

2. Nor does the fact that the claim of the caveating creditor against the estate is disputed afford cause for denying such application.

3. Allegations in a caveat to an application of this kind, to the effect that the administrator is fraudulently colluding with the widow of the intestate to sacrifice the property of the estate and thus defeat the rights of creditors, are without merit, when they rest solely upon facts of the nature above indicated.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Fish, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sanders v. Hepp
8 S.E.2d 87 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 S.E. 214, 111 Ga. 834, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-warthen-ga-1900.