Jackson v. Warthen
This text of 36 S.E. 214 (Jackson v. Warthen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. It is not a good ground of objection to an application by an administrator for leave to sell lands or stocks in an incorporated company, for the purpose of paying debts, that the market is depressed and that for this reason the property will not sell for its full value.
2. Nor does the fact that the claim of the caveating creditor against the estate is disputed afford cause for denying such application.
3. Allegations in a caveat to an application of this kind, to the effect that the administrator is fraudulently colluding with the widow of the intestate to sacrifice the property of the estate and thus defeat the rights of creditors, are without merit, when they rest solely upon facts of the nature above indicated.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 S.E. 214, 111 Ga. 834, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-warthen-ga-1900.