Gatlin v. Starr Piano Co.
144 So. 461, 225 Ala. 558, 1932 Ala. LEXIS 275
Opinion
On the authority of Simpson v. State, 214 Ala. 176, 106 So. 898; Messer v. State, 221 Ala. 379, 129 So. 97; Ballard v. State, 219 Ala. 222, 121 So. 502, and Hardy v. First National Bank, 219 Ala. 435, 122 So. 702, we cannot review the opinion of the Court of Appeals on the point argued by petitioner.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gatlin v. Starr Piano Co., 144 So. 461, 225 Ala. 558, 1932 Ala. LEXIS 275 (Ala. 1932).
144 So. 461 (Gatlin v. Starr Piano Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hardy v. First Nat. Bank of Jacksonville
122 So. 702 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1929)
Simpson v. State
106 So. 898 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1925)
Ballard v. State
121 So. 502 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1929)
Ballard v. State
121 So. 502 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1929)
Simpson v. State
106 So. 898 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1926)
Blackburn v. State
122 So. 702 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1929)
Messer v. State
129 So. 97 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1930)