Simpson v. State
This text of 106 So. 898 (Simpson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant was convicted of the offense of “using abusive, insulting, or obscene language in the presence or hearing of a woman, contrary to law,” and appeals. ' No written charges were requested.by the appellant (defendant) and the record recites'his approval of, the oral charge of the trial court, without exception. Few exceptions were reserved on the admission or rejection of testimony, and these were on account of rulings involving only elementary principles of law. The facts were exceedingly simple, and no error prejudicial to defendant anywhere appears. The judgment will be affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
106 So. 898, 21 Ala. App. 201, 1925 Ala. App. LEXIS 338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/simpson-v-state-alactapp-1925.