Simpson v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Simpson v. State

106 So. 898, 21 Ala. App. 201, 1925 Ala. App. LEXIS 338

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided November 24, 1925·No. 1 Div. 640.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

RICE, J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of “using abusive, insulting, or obscene language in the presence or hearing of a woman, contrary to law,” and appeals. ' No written charges were requested.by the appellant (defendant) and the record recites'his approval of, the oral charge of the trial court, without exception. Few exceptions were reserved on the admission or rejection of testimony, and these were on account of rulings involving only elementary principles of law. The facts were exceedingly simple, and no error prejudicial to defendant anywhere appears. The judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RICE, J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of “using abusive, insulting, or obscene language in the presence or hearing of a woman, contrary to law,” and appeals. ' No written charges were requested.by the appellant (defendant) and the record recites'his approval of, the oral charge of the trial court, without exception. Few exceptions were reserved on the admission or rejection of testimony, and these were on account of rulings involving only elementary principles of law. The facts were exceedingly simple, and no error prejudicial to defendant anywhere appears. The judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Simpson v. State, 106 So. 898, 21 Ala. App. 201, 1925 Ala. App. LEXIS 338 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

106 So. 898 (Simpson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related