Messer v. State
This text of 129 So. 97 (Messer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition seeks review of the opinion and decision of the Court of Appeals on rehearing in that court as to the matter of selecting the jury.
The question insisted upon by petitioner was not discussed or decided by the Court of Appeals, but treated as merely an intimation only, and not a ruling of the trial court to which exception was reserved. Petitioner's argument, therefore, overlooks the limited review of this court of decisions of the Court of Appeals, illustrated by Postal Telegraph Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 So. 91, and the more recent case of Ballard v. State, 219 Ala. 222, 121 So. 502, and Hardy v. First National Bank of Jacksonville, 219 Ala. 435, 122 So. 702.
The writ will be denied.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
129 So. 97, 221 Ala. 379, 1930 Ala. LEXIS 330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/messer-v-state-ala-1930.