Garcia v. State
Opinion
Francisco Garcia appeals the summary denial of his rule 3.850 motion. On appeal, as it did below, the state agrees that the sentences on counts II and III are illegal. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for resentencing on these counts.
We affirm the denial of the remaining claims. Regarding Garcia’s third claim, we note that during the plea hearing, the trial court explained the two scenarios that would trigger mitigation of appellant’s sentence pursuant to the plea agreement. Neither of these has occurred yet.
Affirmed in part, Reversed in part and Remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
995 So. 2d 1127 (Garcia v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.