Garcia v. State
920 So. 2d 204, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1871, 2006 WL 348330
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 15, 2006·No. No. 4D05-3755·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We reverse an order summarily denying appellant’s 3.850 motion because the affidavit of the victim could constitute newly discovered evidence which would not be barred by untimeliness.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Garcia v. State, 920 So. 2d 204, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1871, 2006 WL 348330 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
920 So. 2d 204 (Garcia v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hollander v. State
920 So. 2d 204 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)