Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority
468 U.S. 1213, 82 L. Ed. 2d 880, 104 S. Ct. 3582, 52 U.S.L.W. 3937, 26 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 1334, 1984 U.S. LEXIS 2819
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided July 5, 1984·No. No. 82-1913; No. 82-1951·Published·Cited by 7 cases
Opinion
D. C. W. D. Tex. [Probable jurisdiction noted, 464 U. S. 812.] Cases restored to calendar for reargument. In addition to the questions presented in the jurisdictional statements and previously briefed [1214]*1214and argued, the parties are requested to brief and argue the following question: “Whether or not the principles of the Tenth Amendment as set forth in National League of Cities v. Usery, 426 U. S. 833 (1976), should be reconsidered?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority, 468 U.S. 1213, 82 L. Ed. 2d 880, 104 S. Ct. 3582, 52 U.S.L.W. 3937, 26 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 1334, 1984 U.S. LEXIS 2819 (1984).
468 U.S. 1213 (Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority v. Ann McLaughlin Secretary of Labor of the United States, Joe G. Garcia, Intervenor-Defendant
876 F.2d 441 (Fifth Circuit, 1989)
Patterson v. McLean Credit Union
485 U.S. 617 (Supreme Court, 1988)
Batson v. Kentucky
476 U.S. 79 (Supreme Court, 1986)