Garcia v. PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTES OF AMERICA, INC.

693 So. 2d 66, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 939
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 11, 1997
Docket95-2782
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 693 So. 2d 66 (Garcia v. PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTES OF AMERICA, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garcia v. PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTES OF AMERICA, INC., 693 So. 2d 66, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 939 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

693 So.2d 66 (1997)

Hilda GARCIA, a guardian of Jose Guiles, etc., Appellant/Cross-Appellee,
v.
PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTES OF AMERICA, INC., etc., et al., Appellees/Cross-Appellants.

No. 95-2782.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

April 11, 1997.
Rehearing Denied May 12, 1997.

Prabodh C. Patel, Walter J. Belleville, and Tracey Schilling, Altamonte Springs, for Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

Jeffrey S. Badgley and John S. McEwan, II of Sanders, McEwan, Martinez, Luff & Dukes, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee/Cross-Appellant Psychiatric Institute of Orlando, Inc.

Gail Leverett Parenti of Parenti, Falk, Waas & Frazier, Coral Gables, for Appellee/Cross-Appellant John Blankemeier, M.D.

A. Scott Noecker and Rachel K. Nunn of Taraska, Grower & Ketcham, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee/Cross-Appellant Carol Bloomquist, M.D.

No Appearance for Appellee, Psychiatric Institutes of America, Inc.

PER CURIAM.

Garcia appeals summary judgments entered against her based upon her failure to comply with the presuit notice requirements contained in chapter 766 of the Florida Medical Malpractice Act. We reverse.

In Garcia I,[1] we held that the allegations of Garcia's complaint were sufficient to constitute the torts of false imprisonment and battery, if proven at trial. The requirement of presuit notice is fact dependent, and must be premised upon the allegations of the complaint. Robbins v. Orlando H.M.A., Inc., 683 So.2d 664 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). Pursuant to the allegations of this complaint, the cause of action of false imprisonment did not arise out of the rendering, or failure to render, medical care services, and thus it does not fall under the presuit notice requirements of the medical malpractice act. Robbins.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

W. SHARP, GRIFFIN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

NOTES

[1] Garcia v. Psychiatric Institutes of America, 638 So.2d 567 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Joseph v. University Behavioral LLC
71 So. 3d 913 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Indian River Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Browne
44 So. 3d 237 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
SOUTHERN BAPTIST HOSP. OF FLORIDA v. Ashe
948 So. 2d 889 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Mobley v. GILBERT E. HIRSCHBERG, PA
915 So. 2d 217 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
693 So. 2d 66, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 939, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garcia-v-psychiatric-institutes-of-america-inc-fladistctapp-1997.