Gantt v. Miller

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided March 25, 2024·No. 7:19-cv-02910-VB-JCM·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK LARRYGANTTIR. SSS

Petitioner, 19 CIVIL 2910 (VB) -against- JUDGMENT CHRISTOPHER MILLER, Respondent. wa eK

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated March 22, 2024, the Court adopts the R&R in its entirety as the opinion of the Court. The Petition is DENIED. As petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Love v. McCray, 413 F.3d 192, 195 (2d Cir. 2005). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York March 25, 2024 RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court

BY: ER Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gantt v. Miller, (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

Gantt v. Miller (Gantt v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related