Gamble v. State

643 So. 2d 130, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10000, 1994 WL 568513
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 19, 1994·No. No. 94-868·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals an order denying his 3.850 motion. We reverse the order and remand with directions to correct the defendant’s sentencing order to conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement of sentence. The trial court clearly pronounced that defendant was not being sentenced as a youthful offender; however, on the sentencing sheet it appears that defendant is being sentenced as a youthful offender. This sentencing order must be conformed to the trial court’s oral pronouncement. White v. State, 624 So.2d 811 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gamble v. State, 643 So. 2d 130, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10000, 1994 WL 568513 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

643 So. 2d 130 (Gamble v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. State
652 So. 2d 990 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)