Gamble v. State

598 So. 2d 334, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6464, 1992 WL 115797
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gamble v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 644 So. 2d 1376
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 3, 1992·No. No. 92-0860·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges the trial court’s denial of his rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. As appellant has failed to demonstrate a preliminary basis for reversal, we summarily affirm the trial court’s order pursuant to rule 9.315, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and DELL and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gamble v. State, 598 So. 2d 334, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6464, 1992 WL 115797 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

598 So. 2d 334 (Gamble v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.