Gamble v. State

668 So. 2d 1048, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1471, 1996 WL 65961
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gamble v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 644 So. 2d 1376
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 16, 1996·No. Nos. 94-04413, 95-00226·Published

Opinion

FRANK, Judge.

Laverne Gamble and Robert Cornett initiated separate challenges to the constitutionality of Florida’s Civil Restitution Lien and Crime Victims Remedy Act of 1994, sections 960.29 through 960.297, Florida Statutes (Supp.1994).1 Neither appeal, however, is properly before this court for the reasons expressed in Nevels v. State, 20 Fla. L. Weekly D2748, — So.2d — [1995 WL 733070] (Fla. 2d DCA Dec. 13, 1995), and Snyder v. State, 664 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

Affirmed.

THREADGILL, C.J., and FULMER, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gamble v. State, 668 So. 2d 1048, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1471, 1996 WL 65961 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

668 So. 2d 1048 (Gamble v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Snyder v. State
664 So. 2d 1073 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Nevels v. State
685 So. 2d 856 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)