Gale v. United States

429 A.2d 177, 1981 D.C. App. LEXIS 247
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided March 19, 1981·No. 80-96·Published·Cited by 17 cases

Opinions

ORDER AND JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This case came on for consideration on the motion of court-appointed counsel for appellant to withdraw. The court has considered counsel’s motion, appellant’s motion for the appointment of new counsel, and the record on appeal and is of the view this case presents no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, it is

[178]*178ORDERED that counsel’s motion be granted, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the order on appeal be, and hereby is, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gale v. United States, 429 A.2d 177, 1981 D.C. App. LEXIS 247 (D.C. 1981).

429 A.2d 177 (Gale v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Sims
2019 Ohio 4975 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2019)
Roger N. Rosier v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019
A.L.L. v. People
226 P.3d 1054 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 2010)
In Re Bailey
2009 VT 122 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 2009)
Mosley v. State
908 N.E.2d 599 (Indiana Supreme Court, 2009)
State v. KORTH AND STEELE
2002 SD 101 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 2002)
Ramos v. State
944 P.2d 856 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1997)
State v. Cigic
639 A.2d 251 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1994)
Rose v. United States
629 A.2d 526 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1993)
Watson v. United States
536 A.2d 1056 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1987)
State v. Shattuck
684 P.2d 154 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1984)
Gale v. United States
429 A.2d 177 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1981)