Home/Eighth Circuit/Gail E. Ming v. General Motors Corporation

Gail E. Ming v. General Motors Corporation

195 F.3d 342, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 28098, 1999 WL 984821
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedNovember 1, 1999
Docket99-1615
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 195 F.3d 342 (Gail E. Ming v. General Motors Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gail E. Ming v. General Motors Corporation, 195 F.3d 342, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 28098, 1999 WL 984821 (8th Cir. 1999).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Having concluded Gail E. Ming was a statutory employee and the Missouri Workmen’s Compensation Act was Ming’s exclusive remedy, the district court dismissed Ming’s personal injury action against General Motors Corporation for lack of jurisdiction. Ming appeals, and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its thorough memorandum opinion. See 8th Cir.R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ming v. General Motors Corp.
130 S.W.3d 665 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2004)
Gail E. Ming v. General Motors Corporation
195 F.3d 342 (Eighth Circuit, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
195 F.3d 342, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 28098, 1999 WL 984821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gail-e-ming-v-general-motors-corporation-ca8-1999.