G. Wesley Urquhart, G. Wesley Urquhart, P.C. and Mary Elizabeth Urquhart v. Richard Stephen Calkins, Individually and as Agent-In-Fact, for Mary Olive Calkins, and Michael Easton

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 6, 2019·No. 01-17-00256-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Appellate case name: G. Wesley Urquhart, G. Wesley Urquhart, P.C. and Mary Elizabeth Urquhart v. Richard Stephen Calkins, Individually and as Agent-in- Fact, for Mary Olive Calkins, and Michael Easton

Appellate case number: 01-17-00256-CV

Trial court case number: 2011-21236

Date motion filed: January 14, 2019

Trial court: 61st District Court of Harris County

It is ordered that the motion for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

Judge’s signature: ___/s/ Peter Kelly____  Acting individually  Acting for the Court Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Keyes, Higley, Lloyd, Kelly, Goodman, Landau, Hightower.

Date: __August 6, 2019___

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

G. Wesley Urquhart, G. Wesley Urquhart, P.C. and Mary Elizabeth Urquhart v. Richard Stephen Calkins, Individually and as Agent-In-Fact, for Mary Olive Calkins, and Michael Easton, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

G. Wesley Urquhart, G. Wesley Urquhart, P.C. and Mary Elizabeth Urquhart v. Richard Stephen Calkins, Individually and as Agent-In-Fact, for Mary Olive Calkins, and Michael Easton (G. Wesley Urquhart, G. Wesley Urquhart, P.C. and Mary Elizabeth Urquhart v. Richard Stephen Calkins, Individually and as Agent-In-Fact, for Mary Olive Calkins, and Michael Easton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.