G. Wesley Urquhart, G. Wesley Urquhart, P.C. and Mary Elizabeth Urquhart v. Richard Stephen Calkins, Individually and as Agent-In-Fact, for Mary Olive Calkins, and Michael Easton
Opinion
Order entered January 30, 2018
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-17-00256-CV ——————————— CAROLYN JAMES, G. WESLEY URQUHART, G. WESLEY URQUHART, P.C. AND MARY ELIZABETH URQUHART, Appellants V. RICHARD STEPHEN CALKINS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS AGENT-IN- FACT, FOR MARY OLIVE CALKINS, AND MICHAEL EASTON, Appellees
On Appeal from the 61st District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2011-21236
MEMORANDUM ORDER
Appellant Carolyn James has filed a motion to dismiss her appeal, and
Appellees do not oppose the motion. We grant this motion and dismiss the appeal
of appellant Carolyn James. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (b). The appeal of G. Wesley Urquhart, G. Wesley Urquhart, P.C., and Mary Elizabeth Urquhart will
continue. This interlocutory order will become final when a judgment is issued in
this cause number.
It is so ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Massengale, and Caughey.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
G. Wesley Urquhart, G. Wesley Urquhart, P.C. and Mary Elizabeth Urquhart v. Richard Stephen Calkins, Individually and as Agent-In-Fact, for Mary Olive Calkins, and Michael Easton (G. Wesley Urquhart, G. Wesley Urquhart, P.C. and Mary Elizabeth Urquhart v. Richard Stephen Calkins, Individually and as Agent-In-Fact, for Mary Olive Calkins, and Michael Easton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.