G. Wesley Urquhart, G. Wesley Urquhart, P.C. and Mary Elizabeth Urquhart v. Richard Stephen Calkins, Individually and as Agent-In-Fact, for Mary Olive Calkins, and Michael Easton

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 30, 2018·No. 01-17-00256-CV·Published

Opinion

Order entered January 30, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-17-00256-CV ——————————— CAROLYN JAMES, G. WESLEY URQUHART, G. WESLEY URQUHART, P.C. AND MARY ELIZABETH URQUHART, Appellants V. RICHARD STEPHEN CALKINS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS AGENT-IN- FACT, FOR MARY OLIVE CALKINS, AND MICHAEL EASTON, Appellees

On Appeal from the 61st District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2011-21236

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Appellant Carolyn James has filed a motion to dismiss her appeal, and

Appellees do not oppose the motion. We grant this motion and dismiss the appeal

of appellant Carolyn James. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (b). The appeal of G. Wesley Urquhart, G. Wesley Urquhart, P.C., and Mary Elizabeth Urquhart will

continue. This interlocutory order will become final when a judgment is issued in

this cause number.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Massengale, and Caughey.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

G. Wesley Urquhart, G. Wesley Urquhart, P.C. and Mary Elizabeth Urquhart v. Richard Stephen Calkins, Individually and as Agent-In-Fact, for Mary Olive Calkins, and Michael Easton, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

G. Wesley Urquhart, G. Wesley Urquhart, P.C. and Mary Elizabeth Urquhart v. Richard Stephen Calkins, Individually and as Agent-In-Fact, for Mary Olive Calkins, and Michael Easton (G. Wesley Urquhart, G. Wesley Urquhart, P.C. and Mary Elizabeth Urquhart v. Richard Stephen Calkins, Individually and as Agent-In-Fact, for Mary Olive Calkins, and Michael Easton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.