G. Wesley Urquhart, G. Wesley Urquhart, P.C. and Mary Elizabeth Urquhart v. Richard Stephen Calkins, Individually and as Agent-In-Fact, for Mary Olive Calkins, and Michael Easton

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 15, 2019
Docket01-17-00256-CV
StatusPublished

This text of G. Wesley Urquhart, G. Wesley Urquhart, P.C. and Mary Elizabeth Urquhart v. Richard Stephen Calkins, Individually and as Agent-In-Fact, for Mary Olive Calkins, and Michael Easton (G. Wesley Urquhart, G. Wesley Urquhart, P.C. and Mary Elizabeth Urquhart v. Richard Stephen Calkins, Individually and as Agent-In-Fact, for Mary Olive Calkins, and Michael Easton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
G. Wesley Urquhart, G. Wesley Urquhart, P.C. and Mary Elizabeth Urquhart v. Richard Stephen Calkins, Individually and as Agent-In-Fact, for Mary Olive Calkins, and Michael Easton, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause Number: 01-17-00256-CV Trial Court Cause Number: 2011-21236 Style: G. Wesley Urquhart, G. Wesley Urquhart, P.C. and Mary Elizabeth Urquhart v. Richard Stephen Calkins, Individually and as Agent-in-Fact, for Mary Olive Calkins, and Michael Easton Date motion filed*: February 14, 2019 Type of motion: Appellant’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response Brief Party filing motion: Appellants Document to be filed: Response to Motion for Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc

Is appeal accelerated? Yes No

If motion to extend time: Original due date: February 19, 2019 Number of previous extensions granted: none Date Requested: March 21, 2019

Ordered that motion is:

Granted If document is to be filed, document due: March 21, 2019 Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time. Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other: _____________________________________

Judge's signature: /s/ Justice Peter Kelly

Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: February 15, 2019

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
G. Wesley Urquhart, G. Wesley Urquhart, P.C. and Mary Elizabeth Urquhart v. Richard Stephen Calkins, Individually and as Agent-In-Fact, for Mary Olive Calkins, and Michael Easton, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/g-wesley-urquhart-g-wesley-urquhart-pc-and-mary-elizabeth-urquhart-v-texapp-2019.