Fusilier v. Interstate Surplus Underwriters, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Fusilier v. Interstate Surplus Underwriters, Inc.

345 So. 2d 548

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedApril 13, 1977

DocketNo. 5896

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 345 So. 2d 548 (Fusilier v. Interstate Surplus Underwriters, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fusilier v. Interstate Surplus Underwriters, Inc., 345 So. 2d 548 (La. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

DOMENGEAUX, Judge.

This is a companion case to Fusilier v. Russell et al., # 5894, 345 So.2d 543, and Fusilier v. Pitre et al., # 5895, 345 So.2d 547. See our decision in Fusilier v. Russell, # 5894, 345 So.2d 543, for a complete statement of the case.¹ Defendants were the uninsured motorist insurers of plaintiff’s father, Carl Fusilier. Judgment was had in favor of plaintiff against Allen Boud Flack as a particular underwriter of Lloyds, London, subscribing to a certificate issued to plaintiff’s father by Interstate Surplus Underwriters, Inc. in the amount of $20,000.00. No argument was made in defendant-appellant’s brief or plaintiff-appel-lee’s brief as to this award. Therefore, we affirm the decision of the district judge. Costs are assessed against Interstate Surplus Underwriters, Inc., and Lloyds, London.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DOMENGEAUX, Judge.

This is a companion case to Fusilier v. Russell et al., # 5894, 345 So.2d 543, and Fusilier v. Pitre et al., # 5895, 345 So.2d 547. See our decision in Fusilier v. Russell, # 5894, 345 So.2d 543, for a complete statement of the case.¹ Defendants were the uninsured motorist insurers of plaintiff’s father, Carl Fusilier. Judgment was had in favor of plaintiff against Allen Boud Flack as a particular underwriter of Lloyds, London, subscribing to a certificate issued to plaintiff’s father by Interstate Surplus Underwriters, Inc. in the amount of $20,000.00. No argument was made in defendant-appellant’s brief or plaintiff-appel-lee’s brief as to this award. Therefore, we affirm the decision of the district judge. Costs are assessed against Interstate Surplus Underwriters, Inc., and Lloyds, London.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

345 So. 2d 548, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fusilier-v-interstate-surplus-underwriters-inc-lactapp-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack