Fusilier v. Interstate Surplus Underwriters, Inc.
Opinion
This is a companion case to Fusilier v. Russell et al., # 5894, 345 So.2d 543, and Fusilier v. Pitre et al., # 5895, 345 So.2d 547. See our decision in Fusilier v. Russell, # 5894, 345 So.2d 543, for a complete statement of the case.1 Defendants were the uninsured motorist insurers of plaintiff’s father, Carl Fusilier. Judgment was had in favor of plaintiff against Allen Boud Flack as a particular underwriter of Lloyds, London, subscribing to a certificate issued to plaintiff’s father by Interstate Surplus Underwriters, Inc. in the amount of $20,000.00. No argument was made in defendant-appellant’s brief or plaintiff-appel-lee’s brief as to this award. Therefore, we affirm the decision of the district judge. Costs are assessed against Interstate Surplus Underwriters, Inc., and Lloyds, London.
AFFIRMED.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
345 So. 2d 548 (Fusilier v. Interstate Surplus Underwriters, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.