Fusilier v. Pitre

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Fusilier v. Pitre

345 So. 2d 547

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedApril 13, 1977

DocketNo. 5895

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 345 So. 2d 547 (Fusilier v. Pitre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fusilier v. Pitre, 345 So. 2d 547 (La. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

DOMENGEAUX, Judge.

This is a companion case to Fusilier v. Russell et al., # 5894; 345 So.2d 543, and # 5896, Fuselier v. Interstate Surplus Underwriters, Inc., 345 So.2d 548.¹ Defendants-appellants were made defendants in # 5894 by third party demand. Judgment was had in favor of defendants. For the reasons assigned in # 5894, 345 So.2d 543, we affirm the holding of the district judge. Costs are assessed against Lloyd W. Russell, Administrator, and Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DOMENGEAUX, Judge.

This is a companion case to Fusilier v. Russell et al., # 5894; 345 So.2d 543, and # 5896, Fuselier v. Interstate Surplus Underwriters, Inc., 345 So.2d 548.¹ Defendants-appellants were made defendants in # 5894 by third party demand. Judgment was had in favor of defendants. For the reasons assigned in # 5894, 345 So.2d 543, we affirm the holding of the district judge. Costs are assessed against Lloyd W. Russell, Administrator, and Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

345 So. 2d 547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fusilier-v-pitre-lactapp-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack