Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor & Industry Review Commission

303 N.W.2d 668, 101 Wis. 2d 169, 1 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 263, 1981 Wisc. LEXIS 2723, 25 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 31,750, 30 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 410
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided March 31, 1981·No. 79-238·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The court is equally divided on the question of whether to affirm or reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Justice Heffernan, Justice Day, and Justice Abrahamson would affirm; Justice Callow, *170 Justice Coffey, and Justice Steinmetz would reverse. Chief Justice Beilfuss did not participate.

Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor & Industry Review Commission, 303 N.W.2d 668, 101 Wis. 2d 169, 1 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 263, 1981 Wisc. LEXIS 2723, 25 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 31,750, 30 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 410 (Wis. 1981).

303 N.W.2d 668 (Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Wisconsin Labor & Industry Review Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scott Smith v. Greg Kleynerman
2017 WI 22 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2017)
Estate of Szleszinski v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
2007 WI 106 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2007)
Progressive Casualty Insurance v. Hoover
809 A.2d 353 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2002)
Tinjum v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
34 P.3d 855 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2001)
Murray v. Briggs
569 So. 2d 476 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Bothum v. State, Department of Transportation
396 N.W.2d 785 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 1986)
City of Onalaska v. State Labor & Industry Review Commission
354 N.W.2d 223 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 1984)
Calumet County v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
354 N.W.2d 216 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 1984)
Houslet v. Natural Resources Department
329 N.W.2d 219 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 1982)