Freeman v. City of Boston

178 Mass. 403
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided April 2, 1901·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Knowlton, J.

This appeal presents no question of law. The motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence was addressed to the discretion of the court, and the - decision of the presiding justice cannot be revised in this court on appeal. Shea v. Lawrence, 1 Allen, 167, 170. Lowell Gas Light Co. v. Bean, 1 Allen, 274. Stetson v. Medford, 109 Mass. 242. Behan v. Williams, 123 Mass. 366. Perry v. Shedd, 159 Mass. 200.

The motion of the respondent that a sum be imposed upon the petitioner to be taxed in the costs of the suit under the Pub. Sts. c. 153, § 7, should be made in the Superior Court.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Freeman v. City of Boston, 178 Mass. 403 (Mass. 1901).

178 Mass. 403 (Freeman v. City of Boston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
235 Mass. 482 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1920)
Bacon v. George
216 Mass. 519 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1914)
Zuccaro v. Nazzaro
103 N.E. 907 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1914)
Manning v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
73 N.E. 645 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1905)
Hayward v. Langmaid
63 N.E. 912 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1902)