Freeman v. City of Boston
55 N.E. 1043, 175 Mass. 208, 1900 Mass. LEXIS 736
Opinion
It does not appear that the judge exceeded his powers in refusing a new trial, whether he went on the ground that the newly discovered evidence was only cumulative, or on the ground of its relative importance, or rather unimportance, upon a general view of his whole case. He also may have found that the photograph would be uriinstructive and misleading. See Behan v. Williams, 123 Mass. 366.
Bxceptions overruled with double costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Freeman v. City of Boston, 55 N.E. 1043, 175 Mass. 208, 1900 Mass. LEXIS 736 (Mass. 1900).
55 N.E. 1043 (Freeman v. City of Boston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Barrett v. O'Connell
4 N.E.2d 312 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1936)
Powers v. Bergman
96 N.E. 674 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1911)