Behan v. Williams

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Behan v. Williams

123 Mass. 366, 1877 Mass. LEXIS 294

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided November 7, 1877·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

The bill of exceptions does not show that the presiding judge excluded from his consideration any evidence offered by the defendant, or ruled on any question of law; but only that, assuming the truth of the facts offered to be proved, the judge, in the exercise of his discretion, refused to grant a new trial. Such refusal is clearly not a matter of ex oeption. Fxcej-tions overruled, with double costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

The bill of exceptions does not show that the presiding judge excluded from his consideration any evidence offered by the defendant, or ruled on any question of law; but only that, assuming the truth of the facts offered to be proved, the judge, in the exercise of his discretion, refused to grant a new trial. Such refusal is clearly not a matter of ex oeption. Fxcej-tions overruled, with double costs.

Behan v. Williams, 123 Mass. 366, 1877 Mass. LEXIS 294 (Mass. 1877).

Pincite

123 Mass. 366 (Behan v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related