Frantz v. Moore
This text of 772 So. 2d 581 (Frantz v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Phillip R. FRANTZ, Appellant,
v.
Michael W. MOORE, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Appellant, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Because a motion for rehearing of an order denying a motion for relief from judgment is not authorized, the motion for rehearing did not toll the time for filing a notice of appeal. See Intercoastal Marina Towers, Inc. v. Suburban Bank, 506 So.2d 1177 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Talley v. Canal Indem. Co., 558 So.2d 1088 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) (Anstead, J., concurring). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
ERVIN, LAWRENCE, and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
772 So. 2d 581, 2000 WL 1742449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frantz-v-moore-fladistctapp-2000.