Steele v. Crosby
919 So. 2d 566, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 91, 2006 WL 42241
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 10, 2006
DocketNo. 1D05-2867
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 919 So. 2d 566 (Steele v. Crosby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Steele v. Crosby, 919 So. 2d 566, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 91, 2006 WL 42241 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
Opinion
Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of November 16, 2005, the Court has determined that the notice of appeal was not timely filed. See Frantz v. Moore, 772 So.2d 581 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Fla. R.App. P. 9.020(h). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Medina v. State
919 So. 2d 566 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
919 So. 2d 566, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 91, 2006 WL 42241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/steele-v-crosby-fladistctapp-2006.