Williams v. Crosby
This text of 918 So. 2d 383 (Williams v. Crosby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Willie Lee WILLIAMS, Appellant,
v.
James V. CROSBY, Jr., Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Appellant, pro se.
Charlie Crist, Attorney General; Louis A. Vargas, General Counsel, Department of Corrections; and Judy Bone, Assistant General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the appellant's response to the Court's order of October 10, 2005, the Court has determined that the appeal is untimely. See Frantz v. Moore, 772 So.2d 581 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot.
BARFIELD, WOLF, and BROWNING, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
918 So. 2d 383, 2006 WL 20502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/williams-v-crosby-fladistctapp-2006.