Franklin, Sugar Ray v. State
Opinion
Order entered May 23, 2013
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-00530-CR
SUGAR RAY FRANKLIN, Appellant V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F11-55114-T ORDER
In this case, appellant raises an issue related to the costs assessed against him. The record,
however, does not contain a cost bill or other document with an itemized list of costs assessed in this case. We ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to prepare and file, within seven days of the date of this order, a supplemental clerk’s record containing a detailed itemization of the costs assessed in this case, including but not limited to, specific court costs, fees, and court appointed attorney fees. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. arts. 103.001, .006 (West 2006).
The supplemental clerk’s record SHALL ALSO INCLUDE an explanation of any abbreviations used to designate a particular fee, cost, or court appointed attorney fee.
/Michael J. O'Neill/
MICHAEL J. O'NEILL
PRESIDING JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Franklin, Sugar Ray v. State (Franklin, Sugar Ray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.