Franklin, Sugar Ray v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Franklin, Sugar Ray v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 6835
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 23, 2013·No. 05-12-00530-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered May 23, 2013

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-00530-CR

SUGAR RAY FRANKLIN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F11-55114-T ORDER In this case, appellant raises an issue related to the costs assessed against him. The record,

however, does not contain a cost bill or other document with an itemized list of costs assessed in this case.

We ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to prepare and file, within seven days of the date of this

order, a supplemental clerk’s record containing a detailed itemization of the costs assessed in this case,

including but not limited to, specific court costs, fees, and court appointed attorney fees. See TEX. CODE

CRIM. PROC. ANN. arts. 103.001, .006 (West 2006).

The supplemental clerk’s record SHALL ALSO INCLUDE an explanation of any abbreviations

used to designate a particular fee, cost, or court appointed attorney fee.

/Michael J. O'Neill/ MICHAEL J. O'NEILL PRESIDING JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franklin, Sugar Ray v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Franklin, Sugar Ray v. State (Franklin, Sugar Ray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.