Franklin, Sugar Ray v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Franklin, Sugar Ray v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 6835
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 28, 2012·No. 05-12-00530-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered November <7 , 2012

In The Court of 3ppeabs jfiftb rii5stritt of Zexati at Maftati No. 05-12-00530-CR

SUGAR RAY FRANKLIN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F11-55114-T

ORDER The Court DENIES appellant's November 26, 2012 pro se motion to extend time to file

a pro se brief. Appellant is represented by counsel who filed a brief on the merits and is not

entitled to hybrid representation. See Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel

Op.] 1981).

DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franklin, Sugar Ray v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Franklin, Sugar Ray v. State (Franklin, Sugar Ray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rudd v. State
616 S.W.2d 623 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1981)