Franklin, Sugar Ray v. State
This text of Franklin, Sugar Ray v. State (Franklin, Sugar Ray v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered May 23, 2013
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-00530-CR
SUGAR RAY FRANKLIN, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F11-55114-T ORDER In this case, appellant raises an issue related to the costs assessed against him. The record,
however, does not contain a cost bill or other document with an itemized list of costs assessed in this case.
We ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to prepare and file, within seven days of the date of this
order, a supplemental clerk’s record containing a detailed itemization of the costs assessed in this case,
including but not limited to, specific court costs, fees, and court appointed attorney fees. See TEX. CODE
CRIM. PROC. ANN. arts. 103.001, .006 (West 2006).
The supplemental clerk’s record SHALL ALSO INCLUDE an explanation of any abbreviations
used to designate a particular fee, cost, or court appointed attorney fee.
/Michael J. O'Neill/ MICHAEL J. O'NEILL PRESIDING JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Franklin, Sugar Ray v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/franklin-sugar-ray-v-state-texapp-2013.