Frank Buzzie v. Robert A. Heinze, Warden, Folsom Prison

219 F.2d 114, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 2889
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 18, 1955
Docket409
StatusPublished

This text of 219 F.2d 114 (Frank Buzzie v. Robert A. Heinze, Warden, Folsom Prison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Frank Buzzie v. Robert A. Heinze, Warden, Folsom Prison, 219 F.2d 114, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 2889 (9th Cir. 1955).

Opinion

219 F.2d 114

Frank BUZZIE, Petitioner,
v.
Robert A. HEINZE, Warden, Folsom Prison, Respondent.

Misc. No. 409.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

January 18, 1955.

Frank Buzzie in pro. per.

No appearance for respondent.

Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and BONE and POPE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Buzzie's motion to have an application for a writ of habeas corpus filed forma pauperis was denied by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Northern Division, and no appeal was taken.

He now has applied to this court for a writ of habeas corpus. We are without jurisdiction to grant the writ and the application is dismissed. Taylor v. Squier, 9 Cir., 183 F.2d 67; 28 U.S.C. § 2241.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Taylor v. Squier
183 F.2d 67 (Ninth Circuit, 1950)
Buzzie v. Heinze
219 F.2d 114 (Ninth Circuit, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
219 F.2d 114, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 2889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/frank-buzzie-v-robert-a-heinze-warden-folsom-priso-ca9-1955.