Buzzie v. Heinze

Ninth Circuit

Buzzie v. Heinze

219 F.2d 114

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 18, 1955

DocketMisc. No. 409

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 219 F.2d 114 (Buzzie v. Heinze) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Buzzie v. Heinze, 219 F.2d 114 (9th Cir. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Buzzie’s motion to have an application for a writ of habeas corpus filed forma pauperis was denied by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Northern Division, and no appeal was taken.

He now has applied to this court for a writ of habeas corpus. We are without jurisdiction to grant the writ and the application is dismissed. Taylor v. Squier, 9 Cir., 183 F.2d 67; 28 U.S.C. § 2241.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Buzzie’s motion to have an application for a writ of habeas corpus filed forma pauperis was denied by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Northern Division, and no appeal was taken.

He now has applied to this court for a writ of habeas corpus. We are without jurisdiction to grant the writ and the application is dismissed. Taylor v. Squier, 9 Cir., 183 F.2d 67; 28 U.S.C. § 2241.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

219 F.2d 114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buzzie-v-heinze-ca9-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack