Taylor v. Squier

Ninth Circuit

Taylor v. Squier

183 F.2d 67

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJune 21, 1950

DocketNo. Misc. 177

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 183 F.2d 67 (Taylor v. Squier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Taylor v. Squier, 183 F.2d 67 (9th Cir. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Congress has not given to a federal court of appeals jurisdiction to consider an application for a writ of habeas corpus. 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241. Nor has it given that court the power to allow appeals from, judgments denying an application for a writ of habeas corpus. Such appeals are taken by filing a notice of appeal in the district court in which the adverse judgment is rendered. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 73(a).

The application for the writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. The petition to allow an appeal is also dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Congress has not given to a federal court of appeals jurisdiction to consider an application for a writ of habeas corpus. 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241. Nor has it given that court the power to allow appeals from, judgments denying an application for a writ of habeas corpus. Such appeals are taken by filing a notice of appeal in the district court in which the adverse judgment is rendered. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 73(a).

The application for the writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. The petition to allow an appeal is also dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

183 F.2d 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/taylor-v-squier-ca9-1950.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack