Francis T. Proctor v. United States

D.C. Circuit

Francis T. Proctor v. United States

343 F.2d 317, 120 U.S. App. D.C. 35

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedFebruary 3, 1965

Docket18187_1

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 343 F.2d 317 (Francis T. Proctor v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Francis T. Proctor v. United States, 343 F.2d 317, 120 U.S. App. D.C. 35 (D.C. Cir. 1965).

Pincite

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of appellant’s motion for leave to file his lodged supplemental petition for rehearing en banc, it is

ORDERED by the Court en banc that appellant’s aforesaid motion be granted, and the Clerk is directed to file appellant’s lodged supplemental petition for rehearing en banc, and

On consideration whereof:

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the Court en banc, there not being a majority of the Judges of this circuit in favor of granting appellant’s supplemental petition for rehearing en banc, that appellant’s said supplemental petition is denied.

. BAZELON, Chief Judge, and FAHY, WASHINGTON and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges, would grant rehearing en banc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI