Francis T. Proctor v. United States

343 F.2d 317, 120 U.S. App. D.C. 35
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided February 3, 1965·No. 18187_1·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of appellant’s motion for leave to file his lodged supplemental petition for rehearing en banc, it is

ORDERED by the Court en banc that appellant’s aforesaid motion be granted, and the Clerk is directed to file appellant’s lodged supplemental petition for rehearing en banc, and

On consideration whereof:

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the Court en banc, there not being a majority of the Judges of this circuit in favor of granting appellant’s supplemental petition for rehearing en banc, that appellant’s said supplemental petition is denied.

. BAZELON, Chief Judge, and FAHY, WASHINGTON and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges, would grant rehearing en banc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Francis T. Proctor v. United States, 343 F.2d 317, 120 U.S. App. D.C. 35 (D.C. Cir. 1965).

343 F.2d 317 (Francis T. Proctor v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barnes v. State
461 P.2d 782 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1969)
Francis T. Proctor v. United States
343 F.2d 317 (D.C. Circuit, 1965)