Francis T. Proctor v. Sam A. Anderson, Superintendent, District of Columbia Jail

361 F.2d 557, 124 U.S. App. D.C. 103, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6198
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided May 12, 1966·No. 19342_1·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This case came on to be heard on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and was argued by counsel.

It appearing that the trial judge referred the question of voluntariness of the confession to the jury without first making that determination himself.

It is ordered that this- case be, and it is hereby, remanded to the District Court for hearing on voluntariness of the confession admitted in evidence. Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368, 84 S.Ct. 1774, 12 L.Ed.2d 908 (1964).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Francis T. Proctor v. Sam A. Anderson, Superintendent, District of Columbia Jail, 361 F.2d 557, 124 U.S. App. D.C. 103, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6198 (D.C. Cir. 1966).

361 F.2d 557 (Francis T. Proctor v. Sam A. Anderson, Superintendent, District of Columbia Jail) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Billy G. Byers
740 F.2d 1104 (D.C. Circuit, 1984)
United States v. Kim L. Powe, A/K/A "Kim,"
591 F.2d 833 (D.C. Circuit, 1979)
United States v. Powe
591 F.2d 833 (D.C. Circuit, 1978)
Houser v. United States
508 F.2d 509 (Eighth Circuit, 1974)
Frank Houser and Winnie Houser v. United States
508 F.2d 509 (Eighth Circuit, 1974)
Barnes v. State
461 P.2d 782 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1969)
Jarmans v. United States
303 F. Supp. 763 (District of Columbia, 1969)
George R. Woody v. United States
379 F.2d 130 (D.C. Circuit, 1967)