Francis T. Proctor v. Sam A. Anderson, Superintendent, District of Columbia Jail
This text of 361 F.2d 557 (Francis T. Proctor v. Sam A. Anderson, Superintendent, District of Columbia Jail) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ORDER
This case came on to be heard on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and was argued by counsel.
It appearing that the trial judge referred the question of voluntariness of the confession to the jury without first making that determination himself.
It is ordered that this- case be, and it is hereby, remanded to the District Court for hearing on voluntariness of the confession admitted in evidence. Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368, 84 S.Ct. 1774, 12 L.Ed.2d 908 (1964).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
361 F.2d 557, 124 U.S. App. D.C. 103, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 6198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/francis-t-proctor-v-sam-a-anderson-superintendent-district-of-columbia-cadc-1966.