France v. Winn-Dixie Supermarket, Inc.

320 S.E.2d 25, 70 N.C. App. 492, 1984 N.C. App. LEXIS 3692
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 18, 1984
Docket8317SC1185
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 320 S.E.2d 25 (France v. Winn-Dixie Supermarket, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
France v. Winn-Dixie Supermarket, Inc., 320 S.E.2d 25, 70 N.C. App. 492, 1984 N.C. App. LEXIS 3692 (N.C. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

WHICHARD, Judge.

A store owner does not insure customers against slipping and falling. To hold the owner liable, plaintiff must show that defendant either (1) negligently created the condition causing the injury, or (2) negligently failed to correct the condition after actual or constructive notice of its existence. Hinson v. Cato’s, Inc., 271 N.C. 738, 157 S.E. 2d 537 (1967).

Plaintiff here made no attempt to show that defendant either created or knew of the slippery condition caused by the broken pickle jar and puddle of juice on its floor. Instead, she presented evidence that another customer, who had been in the store fifteen *493 or twenty minutes and was checking out when plaintiff entered, had seen the broken pickle jar on the floor before plaintiff fell. The customer did not say exactly when he observed the pickle jar. From this evidence the jury could only speculate as to how long the pickle juice had been on the floor and as to whether defendant had actual or constructive notice of the dangerous condition. Under these circumstances, a directed verdict for defendant was appropriate. Hinson, supra.

Our decision on the directed verdict issue renders discussion of plaintiffs other assignment of error unnecessary.

Affirmed.

Judges Arnold and Eagles concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

PEERLESS INS. v. GENELECT SERVICES
651 S.E.2d 896 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2007)
Thompson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
547 S.E.2d 48 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2000)
Nourse v. Food Lion, Inc.
488 S.E.2d 608 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1997)
Rachael G. Rogerson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Incorporated
101 F.3d 695 (Fourth Circuit, 1996)
Mizell v. K-Mart Corp.
406 S.E.2d 310 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1991)
Mainor v. K-Mart Corp.
339 S.E.2d 476 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1986)
Barnes v. Wilson Hardware Co.
336 S.E.2d 457 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
320 S.E.2d 25, 70 N.C. App. 492, 1984 N.C. App. LEXIS 3692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/france-v-winn-dixie-supermarket-inc-ncctapp-1984.