Fox v. Starbucks Corporation

Opinion

‘USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK | DOC #: _.. □ □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ DATE FILED: 3/19/2020. RAFAEL FOX, et al., Plaintiffs, 19-cv-04650 (AJN)(SN) -against- ORDER STARBUCKS CORPORATION, Defendant.

pone nnn eK SARAH NETBURN, United States Magistrate Judge: On March 8, 2020, Plaintiffs filed a motion requesting leave to file two exhibits to their motion to compel, ECF No. 35, under seal. For the reasons discussed at the March 19, 2020 telephonic hearing, the Court finds that good cause exists to permit the exhibits to be filed under seal. See Geller v. Branic Int’] Realty Corp., 212 F.3d 734, 738 (2d Cir. 2000) (district courts have “considerable discretion” to initially determine whether documents should be sealed). Accordingly, Plaintiffs may file Exhibits 1 and 2 to the motion to compel under seal. SO ORDERED. abe: NETBURN United States Magistrate Judge DATED: March 19, 2020 New York, New York