Fox v. Starbucks Corporation

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided December 3, 2019·No. 1:19-cv-04650·Unknown

Opinion

Case 1:19-cv-04650-AJN Document 27 Filed12/02/19 Page 1 of □□

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RAFAEL FOX, PAUL D’AURIA, and JILL | □

SHWINER, | No.: 19-CV-4650 (AJN)(SN) DEC 0 □ i Plaintiffs, □□

vs. STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT STARBUCKS CORPORATION d/b/a AND PROTECTIVE ORDER STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY, Defendant.

ALISON J. NATHAN, U.S.D.J.: WHEREAS, all of the parties to this action (collectively, the “Parties” and each

individually, a “Party”) request that this Court issue a protective order pursuant to Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 26(c) to protect the confidentiality of nonpublic and competitively sensitive

information that they may need to disclose in connection with discovery in this action;

WHEREAS, the Parties, through counsel, agree to the following terms, and

WHEREAS, this Court finds that good cause exists for issuance of an appropriately

tailored confidentiality order governing the pretrial phase of this action;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Parties to this action, their respective officers,

agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, any other person in active concert or participation

with any of the foregoing, and all other persons with actual notice of this Order will adhere to the

following terms, upon pain of contempt: 1. With respect to “Discovery Material” (i.e., information of any kind produced or

disclosed in the course of discovery in this action) that a person has designated as “Confidential”

pursuant to this Order, no person subject to this Order may disclose such Confidential Discovery

Material to anyone else except as expressly permitted hereunder:

Case 1:19-cv-04650-AJN DocuMent cf Pi ne

2. The Party or person producing or disclosing Discovery Material (each, a

“Producing Party”) may designate as Confidential only the portion of such material that it

reasonably and in good faith believes consists of:

(a) previously non-disclosed financial information (including without □ limitation profitability reports or estimates, percentage fees, design fees, royalty rates, minimum guarantee payments, sales reports, and sale margins); (b) previously non-disclosed material relating to ownership or control of any non-public company; (c) previously non-disclosed business plans, product-development information, or marketing plans; (d) personal health information or any other information of a personal or intimate nature regarding any individual; or

(e) any other category of information given confidential status by this Court after the date of this Order. 3. With respect to the Confidential portion of any Discovery Material other than

deposition transcripts and exhibits, the Producing Party or its counsel may designate such portion

as “Confidential” by: (a) stamping or otherwise clearly marking as “Confidential” the protected

portion in a manner that will not interfere with legibility or audibility; and (b) producing for

future public use another copy of said Discovery Material with the confidential information

redacted. 4. A Producing Party or its counsel may designate deposition exhibits or portions of

deposition transcripts as Confidential Discovery Material either by: (a) indicating on the record

during the deposition that a question calls for Confidential information, in which case the

reporter will bind the transcript of the designated testimony in a separate volume and mark it as

“Confidential Information Governed by Protective Order;” or (b) notifying the reporter and all

counsel of record, in writing, within 30 days after a deposition has concluded, of the specific

pages and lines of the transcript that are to be designated “Confidential,” in which case all

Case 1:19-cv-04650-AJN Document éf Piet’ 2étie

counsel receiving the transcript will be responsible for marking the copies of the designated

transcript in their possession or under their control as directed by the Producing Party or that

person’s counsel. During the 30-day period following a deposition, all Parties will treat the entire

deposition transcript as if it had been designated Confidential.

5. If at any time before the termination of this action a Producing Party realizes that

it should have designated as Confidential some portion(s) of Discovery Material that it

previously produced without a Confidential designation, the Producing Party may so designate

such material by notifying all Parties in writing. Thereafter, all persons subject to this Order will

treat such designated portion(s) of the Discovery Material as Confidential. In addition, the

Producing Party shall provide each other Party with replacement versions of such Discovery

Material that bears the “Confidential” designation within two business days of providing such

notice. 6. Nothing contained in this Order will be construed as: (a) a waiver by a Party or

person of its right to object to any discovery request, (b) a waiver of any privilege or protection;

or (c) a ruling regarding the admissibility at trial of any document, testimony, or other evidence.

7. If, in connection with this litigation, a Party inadvertently discloses information

subject to a claim of attorney-client privilege or attorney work product protection (“‘Inadvertently

Disclosed Information”), such disclosure shall not constitute or be deemed a waiver or forfeiture

of any claim of privilege or work product protection with respect to the Inadvertently Disclosed

Information and its subject matter. 8. If a disclosing party makes a claim of inadvertent disclosure, the receiving party

shall, within five business days, return or destroy all copies of the Inadvertently Disclosed

Information, and provide a certification of counsel that all such information has been returned or

destroyed. Within five business days of the notification that such Inadvertently Disclosed

Case 1:19-cv-04650-AJN Document 2/ Filed L4iciiv Ogee

Information has been returned or destroyed, the disclosing party shall produce a privilege log

with respect to the Inadvertently Disclosed Information. 9. The receiving party may move the Court for an Order compelling production of

the Inadvertently Disclosed Information but shall not assert as a ground for entering such an

Order the fact or circumstances of the inadvertent production. The disclosing party retains the

burden of establishing the privileged or protected nature of any Inadvertently Disclosed

Information. Nothing in this Order shall limit the right of any party to request an in camera

review of the Inadvertently Disclosed Information.

10. Where a Producing Party has designated Discovery Material as Confidential,

other persons subject to this Order may disclose such information only to the following persons:

(a) the Parties to this action, their insurers, and counsel to their insurers;

(b) counsel retained specifically for this action, including any paralegal, clerical, or other assistant that such outside counsel employs and assigns to this matter; (c) outside vendors or service providers (such as copy-service providers and document-management consultants) that counsel hire and assign to this matter; (d) any mediator or arbitrator that the Parties engage in this matter or that this Court appoints, provided such person has first executed a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as Exhibit A hereto;

(e) as to any document, its author, its addressee, and any other person indicated on the face of the document as having received a copy;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fox v. Starbucks Corporation, (S.D.N.Y. 2019).

Fox v. Starbucks Corporation (Fox v. Starbucks Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)