Fox v. Fox
This text of 430 N.W.2d 542 (Fox v. Fox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petitioner, Raymond Lee Fox, appeals from the order of the district court placing the care, custody, and control of the children of the parties, Mary Elizabeth Fox, Casey Glen Fox, and Samantha Gaythel Fox, in and with the respondent, Helen Jane Fox. Petitioner also complains about two evidentiary rulings of the trial court. As required in cases of this nature, we have reviewed the record de novo to determine whether the district court abused its discretion. Grindle v. Grindle, 226 Neb. 807, 415 N.W.2d 150 (1987).
We find no abuse of discretion either in the court’s order as to custody of the children or in the court’s evidentiary rulings. The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
430 N.W.2d 542, 230 Neb. 218, 1988 Neb. LEXIS 385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fox-v-fox-neb-1988.