Schreiner v. Schreiner

432 N.W.2d 844, 230 Neb. 674, 1988 Neb. LEXIS 461
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided December 23, 1988·No. No. 87-141·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The respondent, Ronald R. Schreiner, appeals the division of property in this dissolution proceeding and the requirement that he pay his wife, Jeanine F. Schreiner, $1,000 toward her attorney fees.

As required in cases of this nature, we have reviewed the record de novo to determine whether the district court abused its discretion in dividing the property of the parties and in allowing attorney fees. See, Fox v. Fox, ante p. 218, 430 N.W.2d 542 (1988); Griffith v. Griffith, ante p. 314, 431 N.W.2d 609 (1988).

Upon de novo review of this case, we find no patent unfairness in the distribution of property and debts of the parties nor in the award of an attorney fee to the wife. See, Rezac v. Rezac, 221 Neb. 516, 378 N.W.2d 196 (1985); Black v. Black, 221 Neb. 533, 378 N.W.2d 849 (1985). Therefore, there was no abuse of discretion by the trial court, and its decree should be affirmed.

Each party shall pay his or her own costs and attorney fees in this court.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schreiner v. Schreiner, 432 N.W.2d 844, 230 Neb. 674, 1988 Neb. LEXIS 461 (Neb. 1988).

432 N.W.2d 844 (Schreiner v. Schreiner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rezac v. Rezac
378 N.W.2d 196 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1985)
Black v. Black
378 N.W.2d 849 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1985)
Fox v. Fox
430 N.W.2d 542 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1988)
Griffith v. Griffith
431 N.W.2d 609 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1988)