Heser v. Heser
This text of 438 N.W.2d 795 (Heser v. Heser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The respondent-appellee, Michael Paul Heser, cross-appeals the division of property. The petitioner-appellant, Patricia Ann Heser, has dismissed her appeal.
As required in cases of this nature, we have reviewed the record de novo to determine whether the district court abused its discretion in dividing the property of the parties. See, Fox v. Fox, 230 Neb. 218, 430 N.W.2d 542 (1988); Griffith v. Griffith, 230 Neb. 314, 431 N.W.2d 609 (1988).
Upon a de novo review of this case, we find no patent unfairness in the distribution of property and debts of the parties. See, Rezac v. Rezac, 221 Neb. 516, 378 N.W.2d 196 (1985); Black v. Black, 221 Neb. 533, 378 N.W.2d 849 (1985). Therefore, there was no abuse of discretion by the trial court, and its decree should be affirmed.
Each party shall pay his or her own costs and attorney fees in this court.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
438 N.W.2d 795, 231 Neb. 928, 1989 Neb. LEXIS 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heser-v-heser-neb-1989.